The
English version of this document is for guidance only.
The Arabic version is the governing text.
PART
FOUR
INVESTIGATION
PROCEDURE
Chapter
I: Actions of the Investigator
Article
62 : If the Investigator
concludes that there is no ground to proceed with the case,
he shall recommend that the file of the case be suspended.
An order to this effect may be issued by the head of the relevant
department.
Article
63 : If an order
suspending the file of the case is issued, the Investigator
shall communicate such order to the victim and to any claimant
in respect of the private right of action. In case of death
of any of them, the order shall be communicated collectively
to the heirs at the place of his residence.
Article
64 : During the investigation,
the accused shall have the right to seek the assistance of
a representative or an attorney. The Investigator shall conduct
an investigation in the commission of any major crimes as
herein provided for. He may also investigate other crimes
if the circumstances of or gravity of the case so require
or may file a lawsuit to have the accused appear directly
before the competent court.
Article
65 : The Investigator
may designate in writing any of the criminal investigation
officers to carry out one or more of the investigation proceedings
other than the interrogation of the accused. The officer so
designated shall enjoy the same powers of the Investigator
in such proceedings. If the circumstances of the case warrant
that the Investigator act beyond his powers, he may refer
the case to an Investigator of the competent department or
one of its criminal investigation officers, according to circumstances.
This proceeding shall be carried out by the Investigator himself
should such procedure be deemed necessary for the investigation.
Article
66 : Whenever someone
is designated to carry out certain investigations, the Investigator
shall specify in writing the matters to be investigated and
the procedure to be followed. The designee may carry out any
other act relating to the investigation, and interrogate the
accused in cases of urgency whenever such proceeding is deemed
relevant to his designated task and necessary for determining
the truth.
Article
67 : The procedure
relating to investigation and the results thereof are deemed
confidential which the Investigators and their assistants
- clerks, experts, and any other person connected with or
participating in the investigation by reason of their occupation
or profession - shall not disclose such procedure. The violator
shall be held accountable.
Article
68 : Whoever suffers
harm in consequence of a crime may file a claim in respect
of his private right of action during the investigation of
that action. The Investigator shall decide on the admissibility
of such claim within three days from the date of filing. If
the claim is rejected, an appeal may be lodged with the head
of the relevant department within one week from the date of
communication of the decision to the interested party. The
decision issued by the head of the relevant department shall
be final during the investigation stage.
Article
69 : The accused,
the victim, the claimant in respect of the private right of
action, and their respective representatives or attorneys
may attend all the investigation proceedings. The Investigator
may, however, conduct the investigation in the absence of
all or some of the abovementioned, whenever that is deemed
necessary for determining the truth. Immediately after the
necessity has ended, he shall allow them to review the investigation.
Article
70 : The Investigator
shall not, during the investigation, separate the accused
from his accompanying representative or attorney. The representative
or attorney shall not intervene in the investigation except
with the permission of the Investigator. In all cases, the
representative or attorney may deliver to the Investigator
a written memorandum of his comments and the Investigator
shall attach that memorandum to the file of the case.
Article
71 : The litigants
shall be notified of the time and place of the investigation
proceedings.
Article
72 : The victim and
the claimant of the private right of action shall specify
places in the town of the court within whose venue the investigation
is conducted if they are not residents thereof. If they fail
to do so, whatever necessary notice to them shall be deemed
proper by notification to the court administration.
Article
73 : The litigants
may submit their request to the Investigator during the proceedings.
The Investigator shall decide such claims and specify the
reasons for his decision.
Article
74 : If the Investigator's
orders and decisions during the investigation proceedings
are not issued in the presence of the litigants, he shall
advise them of such orders and decisions within three days
from their issue date.
Article
75 : In the exercise
of their duties, the Investigators may seek the direct assistance
of the security forces whenever necessary.
Chapter
II: Assignment of Experts
Article
76 : The Investigator
may seek the assistance of a specialized expert with respect
to any matter relating to the investigation.
Article
77 : The expert shall
submit his report in writing within the time prescribed by
the Investigator. If the expert fails to submit his report
by the deadline, or if he finds justification therefor, the
Investigator may replace him with another expert. Each of
the litigants may submit a report prepared by another expert
retained by him in an advisory capacity.
Article
78 : The litigants
may, on sufficient cause, object to the appointment of the
expert. Such objection shall specify the reasons thereof and
be submitted to the Investigator for decision. The Investigator
shall issue his decision within three days from the date of
submission of that objection. When an objection has been filed,
the expert shall not continue in his assignment except in
case of urgency in which case the Investigator shall order
the expert to continue.
Chapter
III: Movement to the Scene, Inspection, Search, and
Seizure of Items Connected with the Crime
Article
79 : When necessary,
upon having been notified of a crime committed within his
jurisdiction, the Investigator shall promptly move to the
scene where that crime has been committed to carry out the
necessary inspection before the effects of the crime have
been removed, effaced, or altered.
Article
80 : Search of dwellings
is an investigative act and shall not be conducted except
pursuant to a statement of a person residing in the relevant
dwelling, that he either committed a crime or participated
therein or there was circumstantial evidence indicating that
he was in possession of items relevant to that crime. The
Investigator may search any place and seize any item which
is likely to have been used in the commission of that crime
or resulting therefrom and any other thing that may be useful
in determining the truth including any document or weapon.
In all cases, the Investigator shall prepare a record of that
search, specifying the reasons therefor and the results thereof.
However, dwellings shall not be entered or searched except
as provided by law and pursuant to a search warrant issued
by the Bureau of Investigation and Prosecution.
Article
81 : The Investigator
may search the accused; he may also search any other person
if it appears on strong grounds that he is concealing certain
things that may be useful in determining the truth. Such search
is subject to the provisions of Article 42 herein.
Article
82 : Seizure of mail,
publications, parcels, cables, telephone conversations, and
other means of communication is subject to the provisions
of Articles 55-61 herein.
Article
83 : Seized items
shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of Article
49 herein.
Article
84 : The Investigator
may not seize any piece of paper or document that has been
delivered by the accused to his representative or attorney
in connection with the performance of the service entrusted
to him, nor the correspondence exchanged between them in the
case.
Article
85 : If the Investigator
obtains evidence that a certain person is in possession of
items relevant to a crime that he is investigating, the Investigator
shall ask the head of the relevant department to issue an
order for the delivery of such items to the Investigator to
enable him to inspect these items as circumstances may warrant.
Chapter
IV: Disposal of the Seized Items
Article
86 : An order may
be issued that any item seized during the investigation be
returned even before judgment is rendered, except when these
items are necessary for the proceedings or subject to confiscation.
Article
87 : The seized items
shall be returned to the person in whose possession they have
been found. If these items were subject to the crime or the
crime resulting therefrom, they shall be returned to the person
who lost possession thereof by reason of that crime, unless
the person in whose possession they have been found is entitled
to retain them.
Article
88 : An order for
the return of the seized items shall be issued by the Investigator
or the judge of the competent court within whose jurisdiction
the investigation has been conducted; the competent court
may order the return of these seized items during the trial.
Article
89 : An order authorizing
the return of the seized items shall not preclude interested
parties from claiming their rights before the competent court,
except the accused or the claimant in respect of the private
right of action where such an order had been issued by the
court pursuant to a claim by either of them against the other.
Article
90 : The Investigator
shall not order the return of the seized items should there
be any dispute or doubt as to who should receive them. In
such a case, the matter shall be referred to the competent
court pursuant to a request by the interested party which
shall order as it sees fit.
Article
91 : When an order
for suspending the case has been issued, such order shall
specify the manner in which the seized items may be disposed
of. This also shall apply when the relevant judgment in the
case has been rendered if the claim for their return is made
before the court.
Article
92 : Seized items
that have not been claimed by its owners – after having been
duly notified of their right to recover them, – shall be deposited
with Bait al-Mal (Public Treasury).
Article
93 : The court within
whose jurisdiction an investigation has been conducted may,
on sufficient cause, refer the litigants to a competent court.
In that case, the seized items may be kept under guard, or
any other security action may be taken with respect thereto.
Article
94 : If a seized
item is perishable with passage of time, or if the cost of
its safekeeping is so excessive that it could equal its value,
the court may order that it be delivered to its owner or be
deposited with Bait al-Mal for the purpose of selling it by
auction whenever the investigation requirements allow. In
that case, the claimant of ownership may claim the value for
which it has been sold.
Chapter
V: Hearing of Witnesses
Article
95 : The Investigator
shall hear the statements of the witnesses called by the litigants
unless he considers that their testimony would be useless.
He may also hear statements from others whom he deems necessary
with respect to the facts that may lead to the proof of the
crime, its circumstances, and its attribution to the accused
or his innocence.
Article
96 : The Investigator
shall enter into the record full information about each witness,
including the name of the witness, his surname, age, profession,
nationality, place of residence and his relationship to the
accused, the victim and the claimant of the private right
of action.
These
particulars, the testimony of witnesses and the procedure
for hearing the testimony shall be entered into the record
without any amendment, cancellation, erasure, insertion, or
addition. These particulars shall be valid only after they
have been approved by the Investigator, the clerk, and the
witness.
Article
97 : The testimony
shall be signed by the Investigator and the clerk, and it
shall also be signed by the witness after it has been read
to him. If the witness declines to sign or affix his thumb
print on such testimony, or if he is unable to do so, a note
to this effect shall be entered into the record together with
any explanation on the part of that witness.
Article
98 : The Investigator
shall hear each witness separately, and he may hear the witnesses
in the presence of other witnesses and the litigants.
Article
99 : Following the
hearing of the witness, the litigants may comment on his testimony
and may ask the Investigator to hear the witness on any other
point they raise. The Investigator may refuse to direct irrelevant
or defamatory questions.
Chapter
VI: Interrogation and Confrontation
Article
101 : When the accused
appears for the first time for an investigation, the Investigator
shall take down all his personal information and shall inform
him of the offense of which he is charged. The Investigator
shall record any statements the accused expresses about the
accusation. The accused may be confronted with any other accused
person or witness. After statements of the accused have been
read to him, he shall sign them. If he declines to sign, a
note to that effect shall be entered into the record.
Article
102 : The interrogation
shall be conducted in a manner that does not affect the will
of the accused in making his statements. The accused shall
not be asked to take an oath nor shall he be subjected to
any coercive measures. He shall not be interrogated outside
the location of the investigation bureau except in an emergency
to be determined by the Investigator.
Chapter
VII: Summons and Arrest and Appearance Warrants
Article
103 : In all cases,
the Investigator may, as the case may be, summon any person
to be investigated, or issue a warrant for his arrest whenever
investigation circumstances warrant it.
Article
104 : Each summons
shall specify the full name of the person summoned, his nationality,
occupation, place of residence, date of the summons, the time
and date for his appearance, name and signature of the Investigator
and the official seal. In addition, the arrest warrant shall
instruct the public authority officers to arrest and bring
the accused promptly before the Investigator in the event
he refuses to appear voluntarily. Furthermore, the detention
warrant shall instruct the detention center officer to admit
the accused into detention center after explaining the offense
with which he is charged and the basis thereof.
Article
105 : The summons
shall be communicated to the person wanted for interrogation
through one of the process servers or public authority officers
who shall deliver a copy of the summons to that person, if
available, or to an adult member of his family, residing with
him.
Article
106 : The warrant
issued by the Investigator shall be valid throughout the Kingdom.
Article
107 : If the accused
fails to appear without an acceptable cause after having been
duly summoned, or if it is feared that he may flee, or if
he is caught “flagrante delecto”, the Investigator may issue
a warrant for his arrest and appearance even if the incident
is of such kind for which the accused should not be detained.
Article
108 : If the accused
has no known place of residence, he shall specify a place
acceptable to the Investigator, failing which the Investigator
may issue a warrant for his detention.
Article
109 : The Investigator
shall promptly interrogate the accused who has been arrested.
If this is not possible, he shall be kept in a detention center
pending his interrogation. The period of detention shall not
exceed twenty-four hours. On expiry of that period, the detention
center officer shall notify the chairman of the relevant department
which shall interrogate him promptly, or issue an order for
his release.
Article
110 : If the accused
is arrested outside the venue of the department conducting
the investigation, he shall be brought to the investigation
department in the area where he was arrested. This department
shall verify all the relevant personal particulars and inform
the accused of the incident attributed to him. His statements
in respect thereof shall be recorded. If it is found necessary
that he be transferred, he shall be notified of the place
of his transfer.
Article
111 : If the accused
objects to his transfer, or if his health condition does not
permit such transfer, the Investigator shall be informed and
shall promptly issue the necessary order.
Chapter
VIII: The Detention Warrant
Article
112 : The Minister
of Interior shall, upon a recommendation by the Director of
the Bureau of Investigation and Prosecution, specify what
may be treated as a major crime requiring detention.
Article
113 : If it appears,
following the interrogation of the accused, or in the event
of his flight, that there is sufficient evidence of a major
crime against him, or if the interest of the investigation
requires his detention to prevent his fleeing or affecting
the proceedings of the investigation, the Investigator shall
issue a warrant for his detention for a period not exceeding
five days from the date of his arrest.
Article
114 : The detention
shall end with the passage of five days, unless the Investigator
sees fit to extend the detention period. In that case, he
shall, prior to expiry of that period, refer the file to the
Chairman of the branch of Bureau of Investigation and Prosecution
in the relevant province so that he may issue an order for
extending the period of the detention for a period or successive
periods provided that they do not exceed in their aggregate
forty days from the date of arrest, or otherwise release the
accused.
In
cases that require detention for a longer period, the matter
shall be referred to the Director of the Bureau of Investigation
and Prosecution to issue an order that the arrest be extended
for a period or successive periods none of which shall exceed
thirty days and their aggregate shall not exceed six months
from the date of arrest of the accused. Thereafter, the accused
shall be directly transferred to the competent court, or be
released.
Article
115 : Upon the detention
of the accused, the original text of the detention warrant
shall be delivered to the detention center officer who shall
sign a copy of that warrant as an acknowledgement of receipt.
Article
116 : Whoever is
arrested or detained shall be promptly notified of the reasons
for his arrest or detention, and shall be entitled to communicate
with any person of his choice, to inform him (of his arrest
or detention), provided that such communication is under the
supervision of the criminal investigation officer.
Article
117 : Warrants for
arrest, summons, or detention shall not be executed after
expiry of three months from the date of issue, unless they
are renewed.
Article
118 : The warden
of the prison or the detention center officer shall not allow
any public authority officer to communicate with the detainee,
except pursuant to a written permission from the Investigator.
A note showing the name of the person who has been permitted
(to communicate with the detainee), the time for the meeting
and the date and content of such permission shall be entered
into the prison register.
Article
119 : In all cases,
the Investigator shall order that the accused may not communicate
with any other prisoner or detainee, and that he not be visited
by anyone for a period not exceeding sixty days if the interest
of the investigation so requires, without prejudice to the
right of the accused to communicate with his representative
or attorney.
Chapter
IX: Temporary Release
Article
120 : An Investigator
in charge of the case may, at any time, whether of his own
accord or pursuant to a request by the accused, issue an order
for the release of such accused, if he considers that there
is no sufficient justification for his detention, that his
release would not impair the investigation, and that there
is no fear of his flight or disappearance, provided that the
accused undertakes to appear when summoned.
Article
121 : In cases other
than those where the release is mandatory, the accused shall
not be released until he has designated a residence acceptable
to the Investigator.
Article
122 : An order for
the release shall not stop the Investigator from issuing a
new warrant for the arrest or detention of the accused if
evidence against him becomes stronger, or where the accused
violates his undertakings, or where the circumstances of the
case require such action.
Article
123 : If the accused
is referred to a court, his release if detained or detention
if not under arrest shall be within the jurisdiction of the
court to which he has been referred. If lack of jurisdiction
is determined, the court rendering the judgment of lack of
jurisdiction shall have jurisdiction to consider the release
or detention request, pending the filing of the case with
the competent court.
Chapter
X: Completion of Investigation and Course of Action
Article
124 : If the Investigator
is of the opinion, following completion of the investigation,
that there is insufficient evidence to proceed with the case,
he shall recommend to the Chairman of the relevant department
to stay the case and the accused detainee be released– unless
he is detained for another reason. An order by the Chairman
of the relevant department in support thereof shall be effective
– except in major crimes where the order shall not be effective
unless confirmed by the Director of the Bureau of Investigation
and Prosecution or his deputy. The said order shall explain
the reasons therefor and be communicated to the claimant in
respect of the private right of action, and to his heirs collectively
at his place of residence, in case of his death.
Article
125 : The decision
staying the case shall not preclude the reopening of its file
and the reinvestigation whenever there is new evidence strengthening
the charge against the dependent. Such new evidence includes
testimony of witnesses as well as records and other documentation
that had not been previously presented to the Investigator.
Article
126 : If the Investigator
is of the opinion, following completion of the investigation,
that there is sufficient evidence against the accused, the
case shall be referred to the competent court, and summons
shall be served on the accused to appear before it.
Article
127 : If the investigation
covers a number of related crimes within the jurisdiction
of courts of similar jurisdiction, all these crimes shall
be referred pursuant to a single referral order to the court
with proper venue for one of these crimes. If the crimes are
within the jurisdictions of courts of different jurisdictions,
they shall be referred to the court of wider jurisdiction.
PART
FIVE
COURTS
Chapter
I: Criminal Jurisdiction
Article
128 : The Summary
Court shall have jurisdiction over ta'zir (discretionary
punishment) cases (except those excluded by a statutory law)
and over hadd (Qur'anic prescribed punishment) cases
(excluding capital punishment and amputation) and monetary
damages (for crimes) that do not exceed one-third of the diyah
(blood money).
Article
129 : The General
Court shall have jurisdiction over cases that fall outside
the jurisdiction of the Summary Court provided for under Article
128 hereof, or any other case that by law falls within the
subject matter jurisdiction of this court. In particular,
this court, convening as three judges, shall have jurisdiction
over cases wherein the sentence claimed is the death penalty,
rajm (stoning), amputation or qisas (retaliatory
punishment) in cases other than death. This court shall not
be entitled to issue a death sentence by way of ta'zir
, except pursuant to a unanimous vote. Should such unanimity
be impossible, the Minister of Justice shall assign two other
judges in addition to the three judges who shall together
be entitled, either unanimously or by majority vote, to issue
a death sentence by way of ta'zir .
Article
130 : The General
Court, in a locality where there is no Summary Court , shall
have the same jurisdiction as the Summary Court .
Article
131 : Venue shall
be determined by the place of commission of the crime, or
the place where the accused resides. If the accused has no
known place of residence, the venue shall be determined by
the place where he is arrested.
Article
132 : It shall be
deemed as a place of a crime, any place where any of the acts
constituting that crime have been committed, or any act required
to be done, the omission of which caused physical harm.
Article
133 : The court that
considers a criminal case shall be competent to adjudicate
all matters that are deemed essential for deciding the criminal
case that was filed before it, unless the law stipulates otherwise.
Article
134 : If a judgment
in a criminal case is contingent on the outcome of a judgment
in another criminal case, the proceedings shall be stayed
pending a decision on the other case.
Chapter
II: Conflict of Jurisdiction
Article
135 : If an action
is initiated in respect of a single crime or several related
crimes before two courts, and both courts have or have not
assumed jurisdiction and that jurisdiction is exclusive to
these courts, the petition for specifying the court to adjudicate
shall be made to the Appellate Court.
[continued
on page 3 of 3]
|